There is so much controversy around the use of AI: Don’t use it for generative writing, but maybe it’s okay (?) to use as a tool in revision. It’s bad for the environment, but it’s also inevitable and being integrated into more systems every day.
Super dense. “Pascal’s-wager logic” how many people know what that is? I also use AI for specific information on technical items in fiction. I’ve experimented with its AI writing content and scenes—with nudging prompts the result is brilliant, discouraging—and oh, so tempting !
I’ve known writers who used AI to create collaboratively—which is fine as long as it’s made plain that’s what it is. I think the trouble comes when someone tries to pass the writing off as 100% their own. There is definitely an anti-AI bias. As for Pascal’s wager, I had to look it up again!
Super dense. “Pascal’s-wager logic” how many people know what that is? I also use AI for specific information on technical items in fiction. I’ve experimented with its AI writing content and scenes—with nudging prompts the result is brilliant, discouraging—and oh, so tempting !
I’ve known writers who used AI to create collaboratively—which is fine as long as it’s made plain that’s what it is. I think the trouble comes when someone tries to pass the writing off as 100% their own. There is definitely an anti-AI bias. As for Pascal’s wager, I had to look it up again!
I wonder how inevitable LLMs really are.